Essay on Why do some men and women commit crimes and others do notEssay Writing Service

Essay on Why do some men and women commit crimes and others do notEssay Writing Service Essay on Why do some men and women commit crimes and others do not? Essay on Why do some men and women commit crimes and others do not?Biological determinism holds the premise that human behavior is the result of innate inclinations and instincts which determine the behavior of individuals. With regard to criminology, biological behaviorism implies that criminals are born rather than made. At this point, it is possible to refer to the obvious prevalence of men among offenders and commitment of crimes by both men and women, when crimes are not driven by some reasonable social or material reason, like the poverty of criminals, for example. Hence, biological determinism offers a plausible explanation to the origin and cause of crime, although the question of reason why some men and women commit crimes, while others do not needs additional, detailed research.Literature reviewBiological determinism naturally raises the main debate of criminology concerning whether criminals are born or made (Mann, 1994). Existing studies (Siegel, 2012) reveal multiple fac tors that may and do influence crimes, among which it is possible to distinguish social, environmental, psychological and other factors. However, all those factors and explanations cannot provide the plausible explanation to the question why some men and women do commit crimes, while others do not. For example, existing studies (Hayward, 2004) reveal the trend to the increasing share of women among the total prison population that means that the number of female offenders has increased substantially. Some studies (Siegel, 2012) explain this trend by the emergence of feminism, while others (Mathiesen, 1998) explain this trend by the changed role of women in society since women have started to play more important socioeconomic part and their contribution to society has increased that resulted in the change of their behavior causing crimes among women. However, these studies does not explain why some women commit crimes, while others still do not commit them in spite of profound change s that took place in society and in the position of women.Furthermore, many theorists (Siegel, 2012) attempt to explain crimes committed by men and women by their social environment and other factors, which researchers consider to be determinant but still they fail to explain those crimes, which seem to be unmotivated. In such a situation, even psychological peculiarities are not enough to explain those crimes since individuals may have similar traits of character but still some do commit crimes, while others do not. Therefore, existing studies fail t o provide the plausible explanation to the problem of crimes and their causes among some men and women, while other men and women, who are in the similar position, do not commit crimes.NatureBiological determinism offers a plausible explanation to the question why some men and women do commit crimes, while others do not. Unlike other theories, biological determinism holds the premise that criminal behavior is innate. In other words, cr iminals are born, not made. Therefore, individuals are born with criminal inclinations, while their personal development, social environment and changes in their life can trigger criminal behavior that results in crimes committed by those individuals. On the other hand, some individuals do not have criminal inclinations that are transmitted from parents to children and so on. As a result, some men and women do commit crimes because of their innate predisposition to criminal activities, while others do not have that ‘criminal gene’ and, thus, they do not commit crimes.The strength of biological determinist explanation of crimes committed by some men and women becomes particularly obvious, when unmotivated crimes are taken into consideration and when the family history of offenders is studied in details. To put it more precisely, sometimes crimes are committed without any obvious reason. Such crimes are traditionally explained by certain emotional or psychological conditi on of criminals but people can experience strong emotions, both positive and negative, and still, as a rule, people do not commit crimes. Biological behaviorism insists that it is individuals with ‘criminal gene’, who can commit crimes because of their heredity rather because of their psychological condition. In this regard, the family history can show that criminals have a long lasting criminal family history, with their parents and grandparents having the experience of committing crimes. Hence, criminal behavior can be transmitted from one generation to another via ‘criminal gene.NurtureHowever, biological determinism is severely criticized by theorists, who reject the idea of innate criminal behavior of individuals. As a rule, theorists criticizing biological determinism refer either to social or psychological factors to explain the criminal behavior of   men and women. However, social and psychological explanations cannot justify why some men and women do co mmit crimes, while others do not. For example, the impact of social environment is virtually similar on individuals. If individuals live in one and the same community, they are not necessarily all criminals but some community members, both men and women, can manifest criminal behavioral patterns. In case of such criminals, the justification of their crimes by their social environment does not work, while inherited inclination to criminal behavior can explain why some men and women commit crimes, while others do not.As for psychological factors, they are apparently important but the personality of an individual is shaped under the impact of his or her heredity and social environment. Specific psychological conditions may explain a crime but causes of such conditions may be still justified by genes or heritage of an individual. In other words, some individuals can response to certain psychological condition in a socially acceptable way, while others respond in a criminal way. For exam ple, two individuals may experience similar emotions, be in similar conditions, and have similar traits of character, but still one individual commits a crime, while another does not. In such a case, psychological explanation of the crime does not work. Instead, biological determinism gives the plausible explanation why some men and women do commit crimes, while others do not.ConclusionThus, biological determinism is a plausible theoretical approach that explains why some men and women do commit crimes, while others do not. In fact, the main reason for the difference is the different heritage of individuals since some individuals have the inherited inclination to criminal behavior patterns, while others have inclinations to the standard, socially acceptable behavior. As a result, some men and women do commit crimes because of their ‘criminal gene’ or heritage. Other theoretical explanations are irrelevant since they cannot always explain why some crimes are committed or why some individuals do commit crimes, while others do not. Instead, they just give partial explanation to either the specific type of crimes or specific individuals, who commit crimes.